LIVE DISPATCH
Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel Beyond Ukraine: Understanding Putin's Vision of Russian Power The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral Silicon Sovereignty: How Semiconductors Are Redrawing Global Power Hierarchies Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security The Negative Impact of US–Iran War on the Pacific Region Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy BRICS Expansion and the Multipolar Moment: Opportunity or Strategic Contradiction? India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies Foot-Dragging as Feminism: Iran, South Korea, and the Ungovernable Body Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability Beyond Proximity: Why the UAE Occupies a Growing Place in Iran’s Strategic Calculus Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations Why Fiji Matters: The New Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific Islands Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? The Long Shadow of 1953: Understanding the Iran–US Conflict Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 Border Fencing and National security: India’s Strategy along the Bangladesh Border Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation Lingering Effects of the Bush Doctrine on Contemporary US Foreign Policy The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference India’s BRICS 2026 Chairmanship Navigating a tightrope Amidst the Chinese Geopolitical Rise Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics The Control Paradox: How Proxy Warfare Enables Strategic Deniability While Constraining Strategic Control Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia The Return of Unipolarity? U.S Strategic Primacy and the Future of the Global Order Supply Chains and Complicity: The Role of Global Corporations in Forced Labour in Xinjiang The Distant Threat: Is Israel Constructing a Strategic Rival in Pakistan Island Militarisation and Techno-Diplomacy: Turkey’s Eastern Mediterranean Fault Lines Amid India-Greece Alignment India’s Security Scenario: An Assessment of its Continental and Maritime Challenges The Geopolitical Architecture of European Defence: Navigating NATO Synergies, Transatlantic Retrenchment, and the Hybrid Threat Landscape The Artemis Accords and the Future of Global Space Governance AI and the Securitization of Critical Infrastructure: Implications of India's AI Summit Beyond Rhetoric: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Sanctions on China’s Treatment of Uyghur Muslims The Emerging Maritime Rivalry in the Western Indian Ocean: India’s Response to Extra-Regional Powers India's Maritime Grand Strategy on Trial : The IRIS Dena Incident and the Indian Ocean Question Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel Beyond Ukraine: Understanding Putin's Vision of Russian Power The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral Silicon Sovereignty: How Semiconductors Are Redrawing Global Power Hierarchies Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security The Negative Impact of US–Iran War on the Pacific Region Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy BRICS Expansion and the Multipolar Moment: Opportunity or Strategic Contradiction? India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies Foot-Dragging as Feminism: Iran, South Korea, and the Ungovernable Body Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability Beyond Proximity: Why the UAE Occupies a Growing Place in Iran’s Strategic Calculus Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations Why Fiji Matters: The New Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific Islands Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? The Long Shadow of 1953: Understanding the Iran–US Conflict Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 Border Fencing and National security: India’s Strategy along the Bangladesh Border Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation Lingering Effects of the Bush Doctrine on Contemporary US Foreign Policy The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference India’s BRICS 2026 Chairmanship Navigating a tightrope Amidst the Chinese Geopolitical Rise Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics The Control Paradox: How Proxy Warfare Enables Strategic Deniability While Constraining Strategic Control Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia The Return of Unipolarity? U.S Strategic Primacy and the Future of the Global Order Supply Chains and Complicity: The Role of Global Corporations in Forced Labour in Xinjiang The Distant Threat: Is Israel Constructing a Strategic Rival in Pakistan Island Militarisation and Techno-Diplomacy: Turkey’s Eastern Mediterranean Fault Lines Amid India-Greece Alignment India’s Security Scenario: An Assessment of its Continental and Maritime Challenges The Geopolitical Architecture of European Defence: Navigating NATO Synergies, Transatlantic Retrenchment, and the Hybrid Threat Landscape The Artemis Accords and the Future of Global Space Governance AI and the Securitization of Critical Infrastructure: Implications of India's AI Summit Beyond Rhetoric: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Sanctions on China’s Treatment of Uyghur Muslims The Emerging Maritime Rivalry in the Western Indian Ocean: India’s Response to Extra-Regional Powers India's Maritime Grand Strategy on Trial : The IRIS Dena Incident and the Indian Ocean Question
ADVERTISEMENT
Nuclear April 24, 2022 12744 Reads

Dangers of a Dirty Bomb: A Real threat or not?

P
By Poonam Jindal
Author • Centre for Security & Strategic Studies
Dangers of a Dirty Bomb: A Real threat or not?
Share Analysis:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STRATEGIC TAKEAWAYS

The 21st century is witnessing unprecedented challenges from the existing war of propaganda and false narratives among the global powers. Russia invaded Ukraine a few weeks ago on the pretext of demilitarizing and denazifying the country. P...

ADVERTISEMENT

A dirty bomb, one type of Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD), is an amalgamation of explosives such as dynamite and radioactive powder [1]. It should not be misconstrued as an atomic or nuclear bomb. The blast caused by such a bomb is not equivalent to those resulting due to atomic attacks like in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The area of coverage is limited and the effect of radiation is restricted to the blast site. The material bursting out during the explosion is much more life-threatening than the level of radiation itself. Only people in close proximity to the area will be severely exposed to radiation unlike in the case of a nuclear bomb wherein radiation spreads like an intractable wildfire.

Mechanism Used

The vital objective to use a dirty bomb is to create a sense of fear or panic among the local population. Scientific studies have pointed out that the intention is to disperse radioactive material into a small and localized area. Only the area where the bomb exploded gets contaminated which has to be properly washed to destroy traces of both radioactive and non-radioactive shrapnel and radioactive dust. Therefore, dirty bombs can be called 'weapons of mass disruption' with a target to make people anxious and destroy public infrastructure [2]. The radioactive material laced in dirty bombs is equivalent to radioactive products used in cancer therapy, therefore, the availability comes in handy. Miscreants can use such material meant for medical purposes and add it to explosives resulting in physical and biological hazards.

The level of contamination in a particular area depends on certain factors including the size and weight of the explosive used, the amount and type of radioactive material inserted, and weather conditions [3]. The last factor remains highly significant, although the explosion is considered to be localized, if the weather at the time of the outburst is windy then it will result in larger damage. Hence, people even several kilometers away will be exposed to the radioactive dust.

Deployed by Non-State Actors

Terrorist organizations have shown great interest in dirty bombs because it is difficult for them to obtain atomic power. They lack resources for the same. However, they can create a sense of panic leading to evacuation by effectively using dirty bombs. There have been instances in the past that terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and Chechen rebels have stationed dirty bombs. In short, with the presence of radioactive substances everywhere and also easily portable, a dirty bomb can be built by anyone, anytime, and anywhere that is why these bombs are such a huge menace.

Al-Qaeda over the years is conducting conventional explosive tests for its bomb program development. Further, it is gathering radioactive material for building dirty bombs. Further, in November 1995, Chechen separatists buried a 10lb of dynamite with caesium-137 in a park in Moscow [4]. This was the first-ever dirty bomb attack in the world. Although it was never detonated, a sense of fear and helplessness was ingrained in the minds of the Russian people. There are many similar stories which make the world believe that radioactivity is not limited to state pursuits and terrorists are enthusiastic to lay their hands on this technology. In the times when global terrorism is extremely worrisome, the threat to use dirty bombs or explosives bound with radioactive material comes to the forefront. It is important that the supply channels of radioactive products are monitored carefully and not reach undesirable groups.

Current Crisis

Unverified Russian media sources have claimed that Ukraine was in stages of developing plutonium-based dirty bombs at the deserted Chernobyl nuclear power plant [5]. Russia stated that Ukraine is using Soviet studies and reports to build its weapon and it was necessary to conduct a preemptive strike to bring this development to halt. However, Ukraine's history with nuclear arms is quite the opposite. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the country surrendered thousands of its nuclear weapons to the independent Russia which would be reciprocated by the economic and security guarantees by Russia, the US, and the UK. All the stakeholders signed the Budapest Memorandum in 1994 assuring that none of the big powers will ever use any kind of force or violence against Ukraine and will always uphold the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. That was the time when Ukraine possessed the world's third-largest nuclear arsenal including 1900 strategic warheads. 176 intercontinental ballistic missiles, and 44 strategic bombers [6]. After the memorandum came into effect, Ukraine became a non-nuclear-weapon state under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT). Currently, Russia stands in violation of the Budapest Memorandum by first annexing Crimea in 2014 and now executing a special military operation on the soils of Ukraine turning towns and cities into mere ruins. Until and unless there is a confirmed report of Ukraine beginning its nuclear production, it all remains just a conjecture. The contemporary international system is not based on malicious narratives or misinformation but proven pieces of evidence.

Dirty bombs have a great value in psychological warfare. As it does not lead to large-scale destruction like nuclear arms, hence, there is no stringent treaty managing its production and supply. Countries who are party to NPT or those who have vowed a No-First-Use policy with respect to nuclear grade weapons can easily without any obstruction accumulate dirty bombs. It is a known fact that no country as of writing has ever used radiological weapons in a war or employed them in its military arsenal. However, countries have exhibited an extensive interest in possessing the radiological capacity to build up deterrence against acrimonious neighbors or adversaries in the region. Conventional bombs are being fabricated to become more ‘dirtier’ with an intention to create a sense of threat or seed more harm than caused by explosives sans radiation. Experts suggest that certain countries might actively use radiological weapons including the dirty bombs in the future if it serves their national interests.

 

References

[1] https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/moretypes.htm

[2]https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/fs-dirty-bombs.html

[3]https://remm.hhs.gov/rdd.htm

[4] https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2016/3/2/isil-and-the-poor-mans-nuke

[5]https://www.livemint.com/news/world/ukraine-making-nuclear-dirty-bomb-in-chernobyl-russia-claims-11646562572661.html

[6]https://www.timesnownews.com/world/truth-or-propaganda-ukraine-making-plutonium-based-nuclear-dirty-bomb-claims-russia-article-90028343

 

Pic Courtesy-Greg Leaman at unsplash.com

(The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent views of CESCUBE).


Poonam Jindal
About Poonam Jindal →

Poonam Jindal is post graduate in International Relations from O.P. Jindal Global University. She did under- graduation in Political Science from Delhi University. She has experience in primary and secondary research and has done a certificate course on Conflict Management from Bar-Ilan University in Israel. Ms Jindal has studied East Asian Politics at National Chengchi University in Taiwan and co- authored a paper on China Military Modernization. Her research interests include China Studies, Geo-politics in Asia, Diplomacy and Security Issues. She is Research Assistant with CESCUBE.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Strategic Analysis