LIVE DISPATCH
Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel Beyond Ukraine: Understanding Putin's Vision of Russian Power The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral Silicon Sovereignty: How Semiconductors Are Redrawing Global Power Hierarchies Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security The Negative Impact of US–Iran War on the Pacific Region Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy BRICS Expansion and the Multipolar Moment: Opportunity or Strategic Contradiction? India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies Foot-Dragging as Feminism: Iran, South Korea, and the Ungovernable Body Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability Beyond Proximity: Why the UAE Occupies a Growing Place in Iran’s Strategic Calculus Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations Why Fiji Matters: The New Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific Islands Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? The Long Shadow of 1953: Understanding the Iran–US Conflict Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 Border Fencing and National security: India’s Strategy along the Bangladesh Border Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation Lingering Effects of the Bush Doctrine on Contemporary US Foreign Policy The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference India’s BRICS 2026 Chairmanship Navigating a tightrope Amidst the Chinese Geopolitical Rise Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics The Control Paradox: How Proxy Warfare Enables Strategic Deniability While Constraining Strategic Control Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia The Return of Unipolarity? U.S Strategic Primacy and the Future of the Global Order Supply Chains and Complicity: The Role of Global Corporations in Forced Labour in Xinjiang The Distant Threat: Is Israel Constructing a Strategic Rival in Pakistan Island Militarisation and Techno-Diplomacy: Turkey’s Eastern Mediterranean Fault Lines Amid India-Greece Alignment India’s Security Scenario: An Assessment of its Continental and Maritime Challenges The Geopolitical Architecture of European Defence: Navigating NATO Synergies, Transatlantic Retrenchment, and the Hybrid Threat Landscape The Artemis Accords and the Future of Global Space Governance AI and the Securitization of Critical Infrastructure: Implications of India's AI Summit Beyond Rhetoric: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Sanctions on China’s Treatment of Uyghur Muslims The Emerging Maritime Rivalry in the Western Indian Ocean: India’s Response to Extra-Regional Powers India's Maritime Grand Strategy on Trial : The IRIS Dena Incident and the Indian Ocean Question Loss and Damage Finance: From COP28 Pledges to Policy Architecture Extended Deterrence Under Strain: Credibility, Assurance, and the Stability-Instability Paradox in the Indo-Pacific Beyond Consultation: BIMSTEC's Emerging Role in Regional Intelligence and Security Cooperation Maritime India: Security, Trade, and Great Power Competition Between the Desert and the Savannah: Conflict and the Political Economy of Instability in the Sahel Beyond Ukraine: Understanding Putin's Vision of Russian Power The Politics of Ali Khamenei's Funeral Silicon Sovereignty: How Semiconductors Are Redrawing Global Power Hierarchies Operation Sindoor and the Changing Dynamics of India–Pakistan Security The Negative Impact of US–Iran War on the Pacific Region Generative AI, Labour Sovereignty, and the Geoeconomics of India's Service Economy BRICS Expansion and the Multipolar Moment: Opportunity or Strategic Contradiction? India's AI Diplomacy and the Future of Strategic Technologies Foot-Dragging as Feminism: Iran, South Korea, and the Ungovernable Body Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Governance Deficit: Challenges to International Humanitarian Law and Accountability Beyond Proximity: Why the UAE Occupies a Growing Place in Iran’s Strategic Calculus Great Power Rivalry and the Crisis of the United Nations Why Fiji Matters: The New Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific Islands Ten Years After Brexit: Regret, Reform, or Reversal? The Long Shadow of 1953: Understanding the Iran–US Conflict Sports, Strategy and Statecraft of Mega Sporting Events as Geoeconomic Instruments: Qatar 2022 to Saudi Arabia 2034 Border Fencing and National security: India’s Strategy along the Bangladesh Border Hardening the Quad: From Strategic Dialogue to Operational Cooperation Lingering Effects of the Bush Doctrine on Contemporary US Foreign Policy The Maghreb of States: Identity, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Non-Interference India’s BRICS 2026 Chairmanship Navigating a tightrope Amidst the Chinese Geopolitical Rise Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding Unconventional Security Challenges in Contemporary Geopolitics The Control Paradox: How Proxy Warfare Enables Strategic Deniability While Constraining Strategic Control Trapped in Deterrence: Nuclear Stability and the Persistence of Conflict in South Asia The Return of Unipolarity? U.S Strategic Primacy and the Future of the Global Order Supply Chains and Complicity: The Role of Global Corporations in Forced Labour in Xinjiang The Distant Threat: Is Israel Constructing a Strategic Rival in Pakistan Island Militarisation and Techno-Diplomacy: Turkey’s Eastern Mediterranean Fault Lines Amid India-Greece Alignment India’s Security Scenario: An Assessment of its Continental and Maritime Challenges The Geopolitical Architecture of European Defence: Navigating NATO Synergies, Transatlantic Retrenchment, and the Hybrid Threat Landscape The Artemis Accords and the Future of Global Space Governance AI and the Securitization of Critical Infrastructure: Implications of India's AI Summit Beyond Rhetoric: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Sanctions on China’s Treatment of Uyghur Muslims The Emerging Maritime Rivalry in the Western Indian Ocean: India’s Response to Extra-Regional Powers India's Maritime Grand Strategy on Trial : The IRIS Dena Incident and the Indian Ocean Question
ADVERTISEMENT
Security May 7, 2022 2259 Reads

Understanding U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy

S
By Sharath Kumar Kolipaka
Author • Centre for Security & Strategic Studies
Understanding U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy
Share Analysis:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STRATEGIC TAKEAWAYS

The Indo-pacific region accounts for half of the world's population and grown as important in recent decades. The region is getting substantial attention from the United States in recent decades and actively taking part with number of count...

ADVERTISEMENT

This article is a brief analysis of the document and the strategy of U.S. for Indo-Pacific. The United States' new strategy for Indo-Pacific, Free and Open Indo-Pacific has been announced by the white house on 11 Feb. the U.S. has been using the hub and spoke system to try and bring balance in a region that it is focusing on. The U.S.(Hub) will try to make this balance by various political, economic, and military commitments with the countries in the region (Spokes). But now we can see some transformation in this policy because of the steps towards greater connectivity between all of the partners.

One of the main drivers of the Indo-Pacific strategy is Rise of China. The document states that the American focus is intensifying because of the mounting challenges Indo-Pacific facing particularly from PRC.

The strategy document portrayed China using the below lines:

“The PRC is combining its economic, diplomatic, military, and technological might as it pursues a sphere of influence in the Indo-Pacific and seeks to become the world’s most influential power.” [1]The U.S. states that its objective is not to change the People’s Republic of China but to shape the strategic environment in which it operates, and it will achieve this objective by building balance of influence in the world where it is most favoured to the United States, its allies and partners, and the interests and values they share. China is a country that doesn’t recognise Indo-pacific as a region, a region that doesn’t come into focus as a region if it wasn’t for China’s rise.

The United States think collective action is the key to their new U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy. they laid out 5 of its main objectives in the region, In the document released in February 2022.

·        Advance free and open Indo-Pacific

·        build connections within and beyond the region

·        drive regional prosperity

·        bolster Indo-Pacific security

·        build regional resilience to transnational threats

these policies are consistent with the previous administrations, they might have been in different terminology and in different order but the crux of the five pillars is consistent with the previous administrations. This is an articulation what has been a broad orientation in the U.S. foreign policy for some time.

As part of their partner to build resilience in the pacific Islands action plan the U.S. will work towards establishing multilateral strategic grouping that supports the countries in Pacific Islands. They also said that “We will focus on every corner of the region from North-East Asia and Southeast Asia to South Asia and Oceania including the Pacific islands”[2]

According to U.S. “Indo-pacific nations are helping to define the very nature of the international order, and U.S allies and partners around the world have a stake in its outcomes”[3]

There are a few things that U.S. can do regarding Indo-Pacific to get more positive response to its strategies

·        Make itself available as a credible alternative to China, as the China is the biggest economy in the region and lot of countries have deep economic ties with the country.

·        Giving them freedom of action.

·        Partnership of equals

Indo-Pacific strategy action plan:

·        Drive new resources to the Indo-Pacific

·        Lead an Indo-Pacific economic framework

·        reinforce deterrence

·        Strengthen an empowered and unified ASEAN

·        Support India’s continued rise and regional leadership

·        Deliver on the QUAD

·        Expand U.S.-Japan-ROK cooperation

·        Partner to build resilience in the pacific islands

·        Support good governance and accountability

·        Support open, resilient, secure, and trustworthy technologies

The significant points from this action plan are covered below

Previous and current administrations placed value to India’s position in Indo-Pacific and looking to India increase its engagement in the region to help offset the growing influence and power of China, Biden administration recognises India as “Driving Force for the quad and an engine for regional growth and development.

The economic component framework is mentioned in the document, but it didn’t publish much more details on that, the world is looking out for if the framework is going to be robust enough decrease economic dependency on China in the region. The strategy document is really long and comprehensive, but it didn’t elaborate on a lot of promises mentioned in the document, for example under “Bolster Indo-Pacific Security” it reads “We will more tightly integrate our efforts across warfighting domains and the spectrum of conflict to ensure that the United States, alongside our allies and partners, can dissuade or defeat aggression in any form or domain.”[4] But the document didn’t mention what role the United States will play and what role its allies will play when the situation rises, which needs a larger discussion.

The United States is trying to transit the security situation in the region into a much more co ordinated terms with their allies and partners to efficiently utilize all the resources. The document was released on the day of Russia’s invasion into Ukraine, the current policy in many ways is trying to bring the countries together for global sanctions and deterrence. Many Indo-Pacific countries-imposed sanctions against Russia. Speaking of deterrence, the United States is planning to strengthen and reinforce the deterrence, by military and technology cooperation.  The document also said that “We will modernize our long-standing alliances, strengthen emerging partnerships, and invest in regional organizations—the collective capacity that will empower the Indo-pacific to adapt to the 21st century’s challenges and seize its opportunities”. The U.S. also planning to be more active in the ASEAN, they are trying to increase their engagement with ASEAN, they are also planning to hold an ASEAN summit in Washington D.C in future. They are also aiming to implement more than $100 million in U.S.-ASEAN initiative. The action plan of QUAD does not include China as an objective or any other security related objectives were mentioned in there, currently the objectives are to handle the pandemic and better distribution of vaccines, green shipping networks, and technology cooperation, climate responses.

Most of the information in the document released is already available in the public domain, and it did give an idea of the U.S. plans for the Indo-Pacific, but it didn’t fully explain how the U.S. is going to implement it. There is a lot of potential for Indo-Pacific strategy of U.S. from the policies which are being carried forward from administration to administration but there is much more potential than those policies in the region with the nee developments in Ukraine and China-Russia de facto alliance. Unlike before the language of the countries in the region towards China is also changing, the countries were more sceptical about being in a situation where they have to chose between the U.S. and China, but the attitude of the region towards China is changing because of it land and sea territorial disputes, and influence in other country’s politics.

The document was concluded by saying “as we enter a decisive decade that holds considerable promise and historic obstacles for the Indo-pacific, the American role in the region must be more effective and enduring than ever.”[5]


Notes

[1] https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf

[2] Ibid

[3] Ibid

[4] Ibid

[5] Ibid

 

Pic Courtesy-Joey Csunyo at unsplash.com

(The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent views of CESCUBE.)

Sharath Kumar Kolipaka
About Sharath Kumar Kolipaka →

Sharath Kumar Kolipaka is doing a masters degree at Jindal School of International affairs, specializing in national security and peace and conflict studies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Strategic Analysis